Comments on: The 960 CSS Framework http://blog.solwyvern.net/uncategorized/the-960-css-framework/ The Sorrow of Fleeting Wisdom Sun, 16 May 2010 02:42:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Fettgans http://blog.solwyvern.net/uncategorized/the-960-css-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-423 Fettgans Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:46:49 +0000 http://blog.solwyvern.net/?p=212#comment-423 Hey, long time no see. 960 seems really nice for simple but I wouldn't use it for larger website. Writing class="grid_4" is pretty much the same thing as writing style="width:300px". Yes, I know there is more than that, but you got my point, it's breaking the separation between style and content. Recently I heard about LESS http://lesscss.org/ which is a brilliant attempt to extend the CSS syntax, adding stuff like variables and nested rules. It's really sweet but the debugging is somewhat complicated since the LESS code have to be manually compiled into CSS. I've yet to found a solution which would suit my taste. Hey, long time no see. 960 seems really nice for simple but I wouldn’t use it for larger website. Writing class=”grid_4″ is pretty much the same thing as writing style=”width:300px”. Yes, I know there is more than that, but you got my point, it’s breaking the separation between style and content.

Recently I heard about LESS http://lesscss.org/ which is a brilliant attempt to extend the CSS syntax, adding stuff like variables and nested rules. It’s really sweet but the debugging is somewhat complicated since the LESS code have to be manually compiled into CSS.

I’ve yet to found a solution which would suit my taste.

]]>